256 Mo is really small, specially if you are running other apps. With a fine tuned server (reduced number of Zope threads to 2, caching on Apache) I believe you can sustain medium traffic on a 256 Mo, depending of the work patterns of your users, but it' s obviously better to upgrade soon.
We, for instance, have 12 small to medium traffic CPS sites running on a 1Gb server with a CPU similar to yours, and we had 4 medium to large websites on a similar server. S. On 2/23/06, Mario Olimpio de Menezes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 23 February 2006 16:07, you wrote: > > Hi Mario, > > > > > > 256 Mb..... really ??? with other sites stuffs running at the same time... > > well, I only got this till now; asking for more, but while it didn't come .... > > > > > For info, when we are putting CPS instances in production it's the > > configuration looks like more dedicated nodes with 2GB RAM on dual core > > ... and we got several of them running in cluster with ZEO... I don't > > I can deduce that Zope is really a memory hog, isn't it? > > > know what's your expectation about the performances but clearly you > > won't meet high ones with 256 and a shared app ones... (I got 1Gb RAM on > > my laptop ...) > > As I said, this is a pretty basic hardware; and yes, I only have 256MB on it. > Hoping to increase it soon. > > > > > Install ZopeProfiler to detect what you can optimize at application level. > > http://www.dieter.handshake.de/pyprojects/zope/ > > > I'll try. > > > > P.S : Tell me you don't have 256Mb on your node :) > :-| > > -- > Mario O.de Menezes, Ph.D. "Many are the plans in a man's heart, but > LinuxUser: #24626 is the Lord's purpose that prevails" Pv 19.21 > http://www.ipen.br/~mario > _______________________________________________ > cps-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-users > > _______________________________________________ cps-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-users
