>
> > Perry wrote:
> > > because at 60, I am still 'actively' learning ( i.e. I have not yet
> > stopped
> > > thinking critically...); and if I listen well, say little, and have
> some
> > > luck, I will learn something; - and maybe meet someone of like mind...
> > (Hi,
> > > Joan!)
> >
> > My reply:
> > Fair enough, but then is it really worth commenting on proposals you
> have'nt
> > taken the trouble to read/consider properly?
>
Perry wrote:
> oh, contrare';
>
> I did read it - "properly"; enough to realize it is flawed;
>
> because I read it but don't arrive at the same value as you do, suggests
to
> you that I have not read it? c'mon, John... how silly.
My reply:
Perry, you made a criticism of the SP proposal which is fine. I asked you to
substantiate it but instead of doing so, you duck the issue you yourself
raised and divert to something else. It is your continued refusal to
substantiate that
criticism which leads me - and I think most reasonable people - to suspect
that you did not read it properly. You will understand that under the above
circumstances, it would be unreasonable for you to expect me to read or
respond to any proposals you might make. If, on the other hand, you care to
substantiate your criticism, I'll be glad to continue the discussion.
John
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
