Hello Perry,
You wrote:
> "that 'plan' is flawed".
I take it you were referring to the Simultaneous Policy. Thank you for
visiting our website and I will respond to your points beneath each one in
capital letters for clarity:
>
> 1) it requires the voluntary compliance of millions against whose own best
> interest it is to comply
I DON'T BELIEVE THIS ASSERTION IS GENERALLY CORRECT. PLEASE SPECIFY
PRECISELY WHICH OF THE PROPOSED POLICIES WOULD BE AGAINST THE BEST INTERESTS
OF THE MILLIONS EXPECTED TO ADOPT SP.
>
> 2) there is insufficient time for mega-solutions to be executed before the
> crash effects begin
YOU MAY BE RIGHT, BUT HAVE YOU ANY BETTER IDEA OR SHOULD WE JUST WAIT FOR
THE CRASH?
>
> 3) the only 'solutions' are local : personal, individual, family, small
> community; not mega-state or global;
I THINK THERE ARE SOLUTIONS AT EVERY LEVEL. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT A SOLUTION
AT ONE LEVEL DOES NOT NECESSARILY PRECLUDE SOLUTIONS AT OTHER LEVELS. I
THINK WE NEED TO KEEP AN OPEN MIND.
>
> 4) the only effective 'plans' are those not published to the world via the
> WWW
NOT QUITE SURE WHERE YOU'RE GOING HERE PERRY...
>
> 5) Joan writes:
> > > ...Any plan is better than no plan, or is it?
>
> it isn't .
>
> sorry; won't work...
I REALLY THINK WE ARE HARDLY GOING TO GET VERY FAR WITH SUCH GLIB
DISMISSALS. AS, REQUESTED ABOVE, PLEASE SPECIFY WHICH OF THE PROPOSED
POLICIES WOULD BE AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF THOSE WHO ARE EXPECTED TO ADOPT
SP. THEN LET'S HAVE A SENSIBLE DISCUSSION.
LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU.
BEST WISHES
JOHN.
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
