Re:[CrashList] Re: Warning Signs?

[Julien Pierrehumbert]

>CB: Marx doesn't agree with this. He doesn't talk about scarcity making non-
>human things a source of exchange-value.

Yeah, that's why I thougt that we might me able to agree on this. See, most of us 
will never agree with old Karl on the value issue.

Anyway, doesn't it look as if in our world scarce natural resources had 
exchange-values (or more precisely, as if the right to exploit them had 
exchange-value, because of course in and out of themselves they have no 
exchange-value)? If you don't think so then how do you explain the various 
exchange-values of different kinds of land, the exchange-value of newfound gold 
deposits, etc.?


_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist