>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/04/00 06:25PM >>>
The debate is going dangerously low. I'm going to try to move it ahead...
Let's see if we can agree on this:
Non-human things are a source of use-values. Non-human things can also be a
source of exchange-values if and only if they are scarce.
(((((((((((
CB: Marx doesn't agree with this. He doesn't talk about scarcity making non-human
things a source of exchange-value.
((((((((((
It's not the action of
these things which creates this value but only their scarcity. Once upon a time
there was a dream about technique overcoming the scarcities of nature. In a
world where this dream is coming close to relization, non-human things have
nearly nothing to do with exchange-values. But when the dream fails...
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
