No doubt I missed the point here. I don't think Charles meant that anyone is
unwitted, unless me, which is probably true. I feel happier and more relaxed these
days, so something is obviously wrong somewhere.
As for Kennedy, assassination is not the same thing as a coup d'etat. There was no
coup d'etat. Kennedy was succeeded by Johnson, his v-p.
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carrol Cox
> Sent: 11 January 2001 13:47
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CrashList] Franchise
>
>
>
>
> Mark Jones wrote:
>
> > > CB: In a way, Mark is saying that the institution of universal suffrage
> > > is 3/4 of Gramsci's theory of hegemony as it works in the real world.
> > >
> > > The U.S. system was most blatantly undermined with the Kennedy
> > > assassination coup, for anyone with half a wit. I guess that historical
> > > example could predict either way with this one. The upheaval of the 60's
> > > might be in part impacted by mass disaffection growing out of the coup.
> >
> > Yes, and yes, I think so: but is there not a big difference between
> assassination
>
> Charles is claiming that Carrol Cox has less than half a wit. The belief that
> the Kennedy assassination was a political coup is simply off the radar
> screen. Its main political use is as a whitewash of American liberalism. It
> makes that imperialist slime Kennedy (he was *worse* than Johnson)
> into a hero. Disgusting.
>
> Carrol
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crashlist website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
>
_______________________________________________
Crashlist website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
