>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/11/01 09:02AM >>>
No doubt I missed the point here. I don't think Charles meant that anyone is
unwitted, unless me, which is probably true. I feel happier and more relaxed these
days, so something is obviously wrong somewhere.
As for Kennedy, assassination is not the same thing as a coup d'etat. There was no
coup d'etat. Kennedy was succeeded by Johnson, his v-p.
(((((((((
CB: It was not announced as a coup d'etat, but it was in fact a coup d'etat. A section
of the ruling class, including the military-industrial complex, decided that Kennedy
was making too much peace in terms of test ban treaties with the Soviets, and too
chickenhearted with Cuba , by not invading it instead of making a deal with the
Soviets on it, and probably a few other things, and they took him out. That is a coup
d'etat, a violation of the franchise of those who eleced Kennedy ( which is the
parallel to the current thread) usurpation of the legal manner in which the president
is removed from office in the U.S.
_______________________________________________
Crashlist website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
