>
> Well, here's my reasoning behind the removal: in my experience at least,
> Reavers tend to just play like a weaker Conjurer early on (they start
> with only 1 MP and miscast often due to their lower intelligence,
> forcing them to pillar dance more if anything). The reaver playstyle is
> definitely a viable one, but not so much on D:1 - starting as a Conjurer
> and later picking up a good weapon once your spells are reliable always
> seems like a better option to me.
>
I see no reason to remove Reavers prior to reinstating them with a different
spellbook. Reavers are a fun, viable class. I'm playing one right now.
Personally, I think that any spellcaster hybrid class that DOESN'T branch
into Charms (i.e. haste) with incredible ease is a great idea.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list
Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss
