Dear Christian-Emi, all,
The answer to the crying smily (German roots "greinen" and "grinsen" are
still distinguished) should be given by the epigraphy experts. What
matters, is their good practice, if it is not conflicting with other
disciplinary practices and basic ontological principles. I suggest
Francesca and Achille to give us more insight. They are preparing the
respective CRM extension for epigraphy, and we need a good interface to
it. If necessary, we redesign these classes to their needs.
Best,
Martin
On 1/19/2020 9:40 AM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore wrote:
I see your point, I have no problem with that and I have no intention
to suggest that such a requirement should be added to some of the
scopenotes. It is a meta interpretation of the model based on the
scope notes not a part of the model as such. if the part of a vusual
sound track is depicted on a surface, then it may represent a
linguistic object without being considered as atext
The inscription class itself depends on how one defines 'text' (not
easy) and with or without interpretation 'Ikke grin!' in Danish means
'Don't smile!' In Norwegian 'Don'cry!'. An engraving 'Ikke grin!' is
it one inscription, two inscrptions or no inscription (Mark) and
simply a human made physical feature?
Best,
Christian-Emil
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
