I agree with Steve. I've struggled to think of any examples that don't constitute the physical object acting as a carrier for a conceptual object. I know the example I suggested for Steve's thinking was a bit obvious, but unless any of Vladimir's examples are radically different then the model seems to be robust in this area.
Best wishes, Matthew -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Stead Sent: 05/07/2012, 18:57 To: 'Sebastian Rahtz' Cc: 'crm-sig' Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: P62 needs a parent and a sibling Yes this is another inscription (conceptual object) that is carried on the physical object (the plague). It is the conceptual object that has the "aboutness" not the plaque. Rgds SdS Stephen Stead Tel +44 20 8668 3075 Mob +44 7802 755 013 E-mail [email protected] LinkedIn Profile http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Rahtz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 05 July 2012 18:32 To: Stephen Stead Cc: Vladimir Alexiev; crm-sig Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: P62 needs a parent and a sibling On 5 Jul 2012, at 10:59, Stephen Stead wrote: > Just trying to understand the problem a little more. Could you give a > couple of examples of the physical object being about a person or > event where the "aboutness" is not a depiction? a blue plaque. eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dickens-plaque-tavistock.jpg its about both Dickens and the building to which its attached. -- Sebastian Rahtz Head of Information and Support Group Oxford University Computing Services 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
