Friends I have to say that a particular coin is a member of a particular hoard. I googled to see how others are dealing with that, but...
I'm tempted to: <coin> <crm:P46i_forms_part_of> <hoard> <hoard> <rdf:type> <crm:E78_Collection> abusing a bit the E78 scope note: "This class comprises aggregations of instances of E18 Physical Thing that are assembled and maintained (“curated” and “preserved,” in museological terminology) by one or more instances of E39 Actor over time for a specific purpose and audience, and according to a particular collection development plan." The "... according to a particular collection development plan." troubles me. Can we say that the guy burying a hoard had a "collection development plan" ? [?] There is a better practice for modelling that ? Dan PS. Not to mention that I would like to associate the discovery event with the hoard, not with the coin.
