Not a vote, but an amateur comment.

-> Collection vs Curated Holdings
Of course. There are “collections" of things which are not curated, just an 
assemblage of stuff. Like some old objects I have which I call my collection of 
old computational instruments, but according to the qualified opinion of my 
wife is just a dust attractor.

But, what about a collection (oops, curated holdings) of videogames like the 
one of the National Videogame Museum of Frisco, TX, USA 
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videogame_History_Museum)? It seems that what 
they collect (oops, “curate and hold”) forms a collection of E28 Conceptual 
Object rather than E18 Physical Thing.

Possibly defining E78 as a curated assemblage of instances of E72 Legal Object 
or, maybe even better, of E70 Thing (in some cases rights may be difficult to 
ascertain as in the examples below), would reconcile the CRM with the curators 
of the Frisco museum; and also simplify life to the curators of the Museo 
Officina Profumo from the Old Pharmacy of Santa Maria Novella in Florence, 
which I hope you will be able to visit when you come here for the next CRM 
meeting, as well as to their colleagues of the Musèe International du Perfum of 
Grasse, France. Is fragrance a Physical Thing? What about the exhibitions for 
visually impaired people consisting in a garden where they smell the scent of 
different flowers along the visit?

-> Holding vs holdings
My knowledge of English is even more superficial than my knowledge of the CRM, 
so my opinion is not so qualified. It seems to me that “holdings” is used here 
in the plural as a collective noun, and not as the result of putting together 
one individual “holding" with another one and another one and so on, as a 
genuine plural; it is unfortunately written in the plural, what makes 
pluralizing it a bit awkward if one wants to keep the “holdings" distinct from 
each other, as Werner has pointed out. Not only: it makes difficult to express 
indefiniteness as when using the indefinite article “a” to indicate “one of a 
series", like in the second sentence of this email where I was in trouble being 
unable to call it “a curated holdings” as “a” cannot go with “holdings”. So 
what would be the correct way of expressing the equivalent of “a collection” 
i.e. one instance whatever of the class “curated holdings”? Wouldn't the 
sentence "Is_A curated_holdings” describing a future subclass of E78 sound 
strange?

Finally, holdings is a synonym of property, according to my Oxford dictionary, 
which is not the case if the objects forming the collection (oops, holdings) 
are just deposited, on lean, or illegally/controversially detained. There are 
famous examples of the latter.

So I would prefer “curated set” or better “curated assemblage”, being “set" a 
very generic term not incorporating the concept of intentionality. 

Anyway, this concern about a name is not so important: that which we call a 
rose, by any other name would smell as sweet. More important is, in my opinion, 
the issue concerning E18 vs E28 => E72/E70 to characterize the components of 
E78, as noted above. 

Looking forward to meet you here,

Franco






Prof. Franco Niccolucci
Director, VAST-LAB
PIN - U. of Florence
Scientific Coordinator
ARIADNE - PARTHENOS

Piazza Ciardi 25
59100 Prato, Italy



> Il giorno 05 feb 2016, alle ore 12:19, Chryssoula Bekiari 
> <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> 
> Dear All
> 
> In the last meeting, the crm-sig meeting decided to vote for the name of E78 
> Collection (issue 270). The proposal is to rename the E78 Collection to E78 
> Curated Holdings
> 
> Please vote
> 
> Chryssoula
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Chryssoula Bekiari
> Research and Development Engineer
> 
> Center for Cultural Informatics / Information Systems Laboratory
> Institute of Computer Science
> Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
> 
> N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR-700 13 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
> Phone: +30 2810 391631, Fax: +30 2810 391638, Skype: xrysmp
> E-mail: [email protected]
> 
> Web-site: 
> http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/people/people_individual.jsp?Person_ID=13
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


Reply via email to