Given that I seem to be in the vast minority, I propose (assuming that the vote is carried as yes) that we introduce further conveniences, following from the same rationale of it being easy to rewrite queries per server, and wanting to require inferencing:
· All of the terms /without/ the numbers (e.g. Material as a more convenient, easier to remember form of E57) · All of the previous names for terms (e.g. both E78_Collection and E78_Curated_Holding) to solve the cross-version issue · Property names without the inconsistent and difficult to remember has_ / had_ / is_ / was_ prefixes Rob From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Jutta Lindenthal <[email protected]> Date: Monday, July 23, 2018 at 7:43 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: crm-sig <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE Label-free RDF classes PLEASE VOTE I vote YES. Jutta 2018-07-23 11:01 GMT+02:00 Athanasios Velios <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: This is a difficult one. I agree with Melanie. I also agree with Rob's point about implementation but I think rewriting a query from full code-label to code-only is not too much of an overhead. Plus we should encourage inference. So I vote YES. All the best, Thanasis On 19/07/18 17:39, Martin Doerr wrote: Dear All, The current text "Expressing the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model in RDF" (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zCGZ4iBzekcEYo4Dy0hI8CrZ7dTkMD2rJaxavtEOET0/edit?ts=5b50b922) contains the phrase: "In addition, for convenience of implementation we have defined number-only classes and properties e.g. “E63” or “P2”, and declared each of them to be equivalent to the corresponding full form" In the past, this option was provided and widely rejected by users. I do not know of any installation using it. It was proposed again because CRM-SIG reserves the right to change labels without changing the code ("E63", "P2" etc.), in cases when the meaning is preserved but the existing label causes confusion and can be replaced by a more fitting or at least less confusing one. These changes are very rare, and explicit in the amendment of the respective version. Those of you who support: "In addition, for convenience of implementation we have defined number-only classes and properties e.g. “E63” or “P2”, and declared each of them to be equivalent to the corresponding full form" please vote *YES. *Those of you who support: "The English label is part of the definition of the RDF classes and properties. Number-only classes and properties e.g. “E63” or “P2”, are not provided". Other means of supporting migration between label versions to be discussed. please vote *NO. *(Those who believe the issue is not sufficiently formulated please vote "VETO". One or more "VETO" will stop the e-mail vote as a whole and postpone it to the next physical meeting) Best Martin -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 | Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 | | Email:[email protected]<mailto:email%[email protected]> | | Center for Cultural Informatics | Information Systems Laboratory | Institute of Computer Science | Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) | | N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, | GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece | | Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl | -------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig This email and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email and/or its attachments you must not take any action based upon them and you must not copy or show them to anyone. Please send the email back to us and immediately and permanently delete it and its attachments. Where this email is unrelated to the business of University of the Arts London or of any of its group companies the opinions expressed in it are the opinions of th<https://maps.google.com/?q=ssed+in+it+are+the+opinions+of+th&entry=gmail&source=g>e sender and do not necessarily constitute those of University of the Arts London (or the relevant group company). Where the sender's signature indicates that the email is sent on behalf of UAL Short Courses Limited the following also applies: UAL Short Courses Limited is a company registered in England and Wales under company number 02361261. Registered Office: University of the Arts London, 272 High Holborn, London WC1V 7EY _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig -- Jutta Lindenthal Mecklenburger Landstraße 5 23570 Lübeck Tel.: 04502-8809421
