I agree that the opaque terms equally disadvantage everyone. No one has any 
benefit at all.

Following this line of thinking, we could be even more opaque by using UUIDs 
instead of almost memorable numbers, requiring that everyone use software tools 
to work with the CRM and no one could look at the data directly with any way of 
understanding it without those internationalized and accessible tools.  This 
would enforce the best practice of multilingualism and not unfairly advantage 
people who have memorized the numbers or can speak English.

Rob

From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, July 20, 2018 at 8:51 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE Label-free RDF classes PLEASE VOTE

Dear Martin, dear all,

On behalf of BnF, I vote YES.

The DOREMUS project demonstrated that  label-free classes and properties are 
very important, as renaming them is very costly, as well as damaging for 
dissemination. For instance, the renaming of  "M14_Medium_Of_Performance" into 
"M14_Medium_of_Performance" (no capital "o") was a nightmare for our IT people 
as well as for those users who had already begun disseminating our data.

Plus, opaque names encourage users to go and read the documentation so as to 
really understand the scope of what they are using, instead of just assuming 
the meaning of a class or property based on the label only.
That is especially true for non-native English speakers: I believe supporting 
multilinguism was precisely the reason why WikiData opted for opaque codes, and 
I think this was a sound decision.



Best wishes,

Mélanie Roche
Metadata Department
Bibliothèque nationale de France



De :        Martin Doerr <[email protected]>
A :        crm-sig <[email protected]>
Date :        19/07/2018 18:45
Objet :        [Crm-sig] ISSUE Label-free RDF classes PLEASE VOTE
Envoyé par :        "Crm-sig" <[email protected]>
________________________________



Dear All,

The current text "Expressing the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model in RDF" 
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zCGZ4iBzekcEYo4Dy0hI8CrZ7dTkMD2rJaxavtEOET0/edit?ts=5b50b922)

contains the phrase:
"In addition, for convenience of implementation we have defined number-only 
classes and properties e.g. “E63” or “P2”, and declared each of them to be 
equivalent to the corresponding full form"

In the past, this option was provided and widely rejected by users. I do not 
know of any installation using it.

It was proposed again because CRM-SIG reserves the right to change labels 
without changing the code ("E63", "P2" etc.), in cases when the meaning is 
preserved but the existing label causes confusion and can be replaced by a more 
fitting or at least less confusing one. These changes are very rare, and 
explicit in the amendment of the respective version.

Those of you who support:
"In addition, for convenience of implementation we have defined number-only 
classes and properties e.g. “E63” or “P2”, and declared each of them to be 
equivalent to the corresponding full form"
 please vote YES.

Those of you who support:
"The English label is part of the definition of the RDF classes and properties. 
Number-only classes and properties e.g. “E63” or “P2”, are not provided". Other 
means of supporting migration between label versions to be discussed.

please vote NO.

(Those who believe the issue is not sufficiently formulated please vote "VETO". 
One or more "VETO" will stop the e-mail vote as a whole and postpone it to the 
next physical meeting)

Best

Martin
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
Research Director             |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
                              |  Email: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>|
                                                            |
              Center for Cultural Informatics               |
              Information Systems Laboratory                |
               Institute of Computer Science                |
  Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
                                                            |
              N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,             |
               GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece               |
                                                            |
            Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl          |
--------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
________________________________

Exposition Picasso et la 
danse<http://www.bnf.fr/fr/evenements_et_culture/anx_expositions/f.picasso_et_danse.html>
 - du 19 juin au 16 septembre 2018 - BnF - Bibliothèque-musée de l'Opéra

Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement.

Reply via email to