Dear George,
I think we should first review D1 and CRMDig, see how it fits to the
definitions from the PARTHENOS project. Then, we should identify a set
of issues, in particular check the
boundaries and overlaps with the other CRM extensions.
I'd rather take a digital object to be one that has an exhaustive
representation in binary format, regardless whether this is done in
cuneiform script or on electronic media.
Since there are subtle implementation issues about where to stop
ontological representation and use data objects directly within a KB, we
should also finish the issue about how to represent a file.
Opinions?
Best,
Martin
On 10/7/2020 8:45 AM, Hiebel, Gerald wrote:
Dear George,
I believe you are right that nowadays most SP5 will be D1 and have
been created in a digital process, lots of times as GPS measurements
or derived from digital sources.
But it may have been created from analog measurements too, or measured
out of a map. Making SP5 isA D1 would exclude these cases, wouldn`t it?
I believe the main point is to be able to attach the provenance and
creation process (an E65) of the SP5 to understand if it is sensible
to be used in a specific context.
Do you have a case, where you would need the SP5 to be a D1 by
definition?
Best,
Gerald
*From: *Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of "george.
bruseker" <[email protected]>
*Date: *Tuesday, 6. October 2020 at 14:49
*To: *crm-sig <[email protected]>
*Subject: *[Crm-sig] Modelling Question: SP5 Geometric Place
Expression and D1 Digital Object
Dear all,
Just a question here. SP5 Geometric Place Expression is to my
understanding the class we would use to describe a line, polygon etc.
that is created in an information system in order to express a
declarative place SP6 that we are using to approximate a real place E53.
I note that SP5 is a subclass of: E73 Information Object ,E47 Spatial
Coordinates, Geometry ,
E94 Space Primitive
I understand then that SP5 is both a geometric value and also an
information object.
My question is: can/should there be a harmonization between family
models such that SP5 isA D1 Digital Object. I ask this because in
actual practice I assume that most SP5 will arise out of a digital
process and therefore, we may want to make this connection.
Opinions / thoughts?
Sincerely,
George
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
