?Sounds right. We should make a note somewhere in the introduction. Christian-Emil
________________________________ From: Stephen Stead <[email protected]> Sent: 18 November 2020 09:50 To: Christian-Emil Smith Ore; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Crm-sig] quantification of .1 properties Hi Christian-Emil I have always considered there to be only one possible .1 per instance of the base property. Any additional "complexity" can be dealt with in the Thesaurus supporting the E55 Type. Of course if you implement with the PC class then the world is your oyster! TTFN SdS Stephen Stead Tel +44 20 8668 3075 Mob +44 7802 755 013 E-mail [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> LinkedIn Profile https://www.linkedin.com/in/steads/ From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Christian-Emil Smith Ore Sent: 18 November 2020 08:27 To: [email protected] Subject: [Crm-sig] quantification of .1 properties Dear all, What is the quantification of .1 properties? For example for P3 has Note it can be useful to use more than one instanc eof the P3.1 has type: E55<file:///M:/cidoc-crm/2020/48th%20meeting%2020-22-23-10-2020/CIDOC%20CRM_v.7.0.1_%2018-10-2020.docx#_heading=h.upglbi> Type? specifying. Best, Christian-Emil [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
