On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:54 AM Martin Doerr <mar...@ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> My argument about measuring non-physical things is that it does not > constitute an observation process, but an abstraction from observable > things. We can always use Attribute Assignment for such evaluations. So, we > can assign the word count to a text, without using E16 Measurement. > Understood, and agreed. The scope note for E16 is clear that is for measuring "physical properties ... by ... direct observation of particular states". A word count would be an Attribute Assignment of the Dimension to the Linguistic Object, potentially using a particular specific object as a witness for the symbols. Of course, I can count symbols in my head, but then I am not observing the symbols physically, and therefore it is not a Measurement. If I am not able to be at the SIG session where this is discussed, please count this as my vote in favor of the resolution of the issue. Rob -- Rob Sanderson Director for Cultural Heritage Metadata Yale University
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
