On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Tom Schindl <[email protected]>
wrote:

> [...]
>
> > What I have down for the feature name may be a bit more controversial.
> > I'm thinking of this from the consumer's point of view: the project name
> > isn't generally interesting (unless you've mounted a serious
> > brand-recognition campaign); it is the functionality provided by the
> > feature that needs to be related.
> >
> > IMHO, the EGit project does a decent job of this. The feature name is
> > "Git Team Provider" and the provider name is "Eclipse EGit". Other
> > features include "Task focused interface for Eclipse Git Team Provider".
> > It's immediately clear what these features provide. They even provide
> > some helpful information in the description of the feature.
>
> I disagree with you on that. I think it has value that the project name
> is in the feature name and the reason it simple: Better grouping on the
> p2-Update-UI!
>
> Uncheck the "Group itemy by category" and discover that you'd never have
> found that "Task focused ..." but now imagine you know Mylyn or EGit and
> it would have been found next to all other mylyn/egit entries you'd had
> a much easier life!
>

pushed https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/36602/ for review to improve this


> So I'm -1 on the proposal to drop the project name!
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Thomas Schindl, CTO
> BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
> Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck
> http://www.bestsolution.at/
> Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to