Tom,

> Am 17.11.2014 um 22:26 schrieb Tom Schindl <[email protected]>:
> I disagree with you on that. I think it has value that the project name
> is in the feature name and the reason it simple: Better grouping on the
> p2-Update-UI!


Those points seems valid … but isn’t it insane how we constrain ourselves to 
drive a decision because of some broken UI? I actually prefer more descriptive 
feature names and stopped repeating the project name in features.

-Gunnar


-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
[email protected]





_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to