Hi Wayne
I see feature names primarily in terms of what appears in the SimRel
repo. Here you recommendations seem to conflict a little with useability.
On 17/11/2014 20:29, Wayne Beaton wrote:
IMHO, the EGit project does a decent job of this. The feature name is
"Git Team Provider" and the provider name is "Eclipse EGit". Other
features include "Task focused interface for Eclipse Git Team
Provider". It's immediately clear what these features provide. They
even provide some helpful information in the description of the feature.
(I thought I had raised a Buigzilla against this but cannot find it.)
I find the distributed contrbutions of EGIT in the Collaborations
category unhelpful. Yes make them descriptive, but please put the short
project name at the start so that all contributions from the same
project group together. And put the project name at the start so that
visual search is sensible.
My screen isn't big enough to show the "Task focussed ...".
So IMHO all EGIT names should start with exactly one of GIT or EGIT.
If we had sub-categories this conflict would vanish, since the parent
category would be perhaps Eclipse GIT, and the category entries can be
unconstrained.
Worst of all are features that start "Source for ...".
Regards
Ed Willink
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
