On 09/23/2015 08:43 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 09/23/2015 08:35 AM, Etienne Studer wrote:
Dave Williams gave directions on how to proceed with this problem:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=478054
In short, there will be no respin of Mars 1.
I've read David's comments there, and I fully disagree with it (for
the reasons mentioned in previous mail). Isn't it something the
Architecture Concil should decide?
Also, many extenders directly rely on the Simrel repo content to resolve
their dependencies. So 3rd party projects extending or shipping
buildship and referencing only Simrel repo (and not BuildShip one) will
suffer from this issue and will have to fix it locally.
This issue introduce a non negligeable cost for all users, extenders and
embedders of BuildShip who consume SimRel repo.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
