On 01/08/2016 10:54 AM, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Mickael Istria <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 01/07/2016 07:40 PM, David M Williams wrote:
Yep. You have stated your desire to "test for that" ... so have
at it.
I'll investigate around the possibility of adding tests/validators
for this. Ideally, it would be interesting to have Gerrit allowing
multiple automated votes from Hudson.
Gerrit allows to define additional voting labels on a project [1].
These voting labels can be mapped to different categories of tests
that can be checked in different build jobs. So you could use the
standard "Verified" label to check if the change doesn't break
the syntax of the model. Another custom label "fullyQualifiedVersion"
could be defined for checking if all referenced artefact versions
are fully qualified.
[1]
https://git.eclipse.org/r/Documentation/config-labels.html#label_custom
Awesome, thanks!
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
