On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 21:07, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote:

> The local build of simrel worked perfectly well - The expected 10.0.5
> snapshot version* was there. You can see a log of the build and tree of the
> output directory attached.
>
> Because RAP only provided me a private build for the 10.0.5 snapshot test
> which I used for my local tests, the local build doesn't match
> https://download.eclipse.org/staging/2021-06/. The staging repo has no
> slf4j (great!) but has two versions of Jetty (as expected).
>
> I have built and smoke tested (basic operation, help, checked which
> versions are installed of jetty and slf4j) EPP packages locally against my
> local simrel build and all looks good. I am not running the EPP build
> against the public staging repo. Other than the final versions of Jetty we
> can do preliminary testing on that ahead of the final build.
>

I am *now* running the EPP build....


>
> So now we wait for the official 10.0.5 release of Jetty and we'll be good
> to go.
>
> Jonah
>
>
> * The Platform and WTP repackaging of 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT took different
> approaches, so while they are built from the same maven coordinates, the
> ones in platform are version 10.0.5.SNAPSHOT and the ones from webtools is
> 10.0.5.20210610181657
>
> ~~~
> Jonah Graham
> Kichwa Coders
> www.kichwacoders.com
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 18:50, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote:
>
>> I have just seen that WTP has done the simrel contribution (thanks
>> Nitin).
>>
>> RAP have provided me a private build.
>>
>> I am building everything locally now and will advise later today.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jonah
>>
>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:47 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 👍
>>>
>>> I was curious whether there is any changes to rerdeer needed going
>>> forward now that it isn't republishing SLF4J alpha.
>>>
>>> Perhaps there is nothing more needed.
>>>
>>> I assume the WTP update is coming soon. Nitin, let me know if you need
>>> anything in this regard.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jonah
>>>
>>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:37 Ondrej Dockal, <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jonah,
>>>>
>>>> I have rebuilt my release update site, though, anything except reddeer
>>>> bundles timestamps have changed, as expected. But to initiate
>>>> an aggregator validation I have prepared a gerrit commit (without actual
>>>> change to aggrcon file) [1]. I can probably wait for [2] WTP change to
>>>> rebase and rerun to make sure we are good.
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181811
>>>> [2]:
>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181810
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:50 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sravan has provided me with a link to what should represent Platform's
>>>>> contribution based on the jetty snapshot.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think we need to wait for a respin of the snapshot for the
>>>>> source bundle issue that Sravan identified.
>>>>>
>>>>> If other projects (RAP / Webtools/ Reddeer) can do the same, or
>>>>> provide me with build instructions I can smoke test the integration of
>>>>> everything in SimRel/EPP and make sure it all looks good and try to report
>>>>> back to Jetty so they can make their release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Jonah
>>>>> ~~~
>>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Sravan K Lakkimsetti <
>>>>> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Triggered a platform build with latest 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT. But there is
>>>>>> issue in the source bundles as they contain temporary files
>>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858764165
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sravan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>>>> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 21:36
>>>>>> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED
>>>>>> from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the
>>>>>> status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The snapshot is ready
>>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonah
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part
>>>>>> thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has
>>>>>> slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected)
>>>>>> have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot (
>>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that
>>>>>> fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and 
>>>>>> JEE
>>>>>> package won't have alpha1 jar anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively
>>>>>> test that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a
>>>>>> further 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of
>>>>>> everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any suggestions are very welcome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jonah
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~
>>>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after
>>>>>> RedDeer is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty
>>>>>> should be built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for 
>>>>>> updating
>>>>>> all deps in all project, though, in quite late time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ondre/Nitin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738
>>>>>> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think
>>>>>> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonah
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~
>>>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ondrej,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from
>>>>>> reddeer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4
>>>>>> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j
>>>>>> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is
>>>>>> unintentionally breaking WTP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think
>>>>>> there is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just 
>>>>>> need
>>>>>> a resolution of WTP first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonah
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~
>>>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation,
>>>>>> this time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) 
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> can be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it
>>>>>> from my side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to
>>>>>> handle this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> fixed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in
>>>>>> release, not sure if that can help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ondrej,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2
>>>>>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from
>>>>>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Markus,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you
>>>>>> mean that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many
>>>>>> projects, then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, 
>>>>>> wtp,
>>>>>> and reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06
>>>>>> release entirely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nitin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is
>>>>>> still publishing slf4j 2.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonah
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~
>>>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP
>>>>>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I
>>>>>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <
>>>>>> mkna...@eclipsesource.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially
>>>>>> because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2
>>>>>> repository for building. I will try that now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is
>>>>>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution*
>>>>>> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done 
>>>>>> that I
>>>>>> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means
>>>>>> that Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel
>>>>>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or
>>>>>> jetty 10 from other sources.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to
>>>>>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel
>>>>>> please.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has
>>>>>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2
>>>>>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel
>>>>>> output repo!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jonah
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~~~
>>>>>> Jonah Graham
>>>>>> Kichwa Coders
>>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to