On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 21:07, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote:
> The local build of simrel worked perfectly well - The expected 10.0.5 > snapshot version* was there. You can see a log of the build and tree of the > output directory attached. > > Because RAP only provided me a private build for the 10.0.5 snapshot test > which I used for my local tests, the local build doesn't match > https://download.eclipse.org/staging/2021-06/. The staging repo has no > slf4j (great!) but has two versions of Jetty (as expected). > > I have built and smoke tested (basic operation, help, checked which > versions are installed of jetty and slf4j) EPP packages locally against my > local simrel build and all looks good. I am not running the EPP build > against the public staging repo. Other than the final versions of Jetty we > can do preliminary testing on that ahead of the final build. > I am *now* running the EPP build.... > > So now we wait for the official 10.0.5 release of Jetty and we'll be good > to go. > > Jonah > > > * The Platform and WTP repackaging of 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT took different > approaches, so while they are built from the same maven coordinates, the > ones in platform are version 10.0.5.SNAPSHOT and the ones from webtools is > 10.0.5.20210610181657 > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 18:50, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > >> I have just seen that WTP has done the simrel contribution (thanks >> Nitin). >> >> RAP have provided me a private build. >> >> I am building everything locally now and will advise later today. >> >> Thanks, >> Jonah >> >> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:47 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >> wrote: >> >>> 👍 >>> >>> I was curious whether there is any changes to rerdeer needed going >>> forward now that it isn't republishing SLF4J alpha. >>> >>> Perhaps there is nothing more needed. >>> >>> I assume the WTP update is coming soon. Nitin, let me know if you need >>> anything in this regard. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Jonah >>> >>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:37 Ondrej Dockal, <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Jonah, >>>> >>>> I have rebuilt my release update site, though, anything except reddeer >>>> bundles timestamps have changed, as expected. But to initiate >>>> an aggregator validation I have prepared a gerrit commit (without actual >>>> change to aggrcon file) [1]. I can probably wait for [2] WTP change to >>>> rebase and rerun to make sure we are good. >>>> >>>> [1]: >>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181811 >>>> [2]: >>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181810 >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:50 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi folks, >>>>> >>>>> Sravan has provided me with a link to what should represent Platform's >>>>> contribution based on the jetty snapshot. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think we need to wait for a respin of the snapshot for the >>>>> source bundle issue that Sravan identified. >>>>> >>>>> If other projects (RAP / Webtools/ Reddeer) can do the same, or >>>>> provide me with build instructions I can smoke test the integration of >>>>> everything in SimRel/EPP and make sure it all looks good and try to report >>>>> back to Jetty so they can make their release. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Jonah >>>>> ~~~ >>>>> Jonah Graham >>>>> Kichwa Coders >>>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Sravan K Lakkimsetti < >>>>> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Triggered a platform build with latest 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT. But there is >>>>>> issue in the source bundles as they contain temporary files >>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858764165 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Sravan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>>>> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 21:36 >>>>>> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >>>>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED >>>>>> from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the >>>>>> status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The snapshot is ready >>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonah >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part >>>>>> thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has >>>>>> slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected) >>>>>> have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot ( >>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that >>>>>> fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and >>>>>> JEE >>>>>> package won't have alpha1 jar anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively >>>>>> test that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a >>>>>> further 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of >>>>>> everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any suggestions are very welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Jonah >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ~~~ >>>>>> Jonah Graham >>>>>> Kichwa Coders >>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after >>>>>> RedDeer is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty >>>>>> should be built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for >>>>>> updating >>>>>> all deps in all project, though, in quite late time. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ondre/Nitin, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738 >>>>>> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think >>>>>> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonah >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ~~~ >>>>>> Jonah Graham >>>>>> Kichwa Coders >>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ondrej, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from >>>>>> reddeer. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4 >>>>>> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j >>>>>> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is >>>>>> unintentionally breaking WTP. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think >>>>>> there is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just >>>>>> need >>>>>> a resolution of WTP first. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonah >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ~~~ >>>>>> Jonah Graham >>>>>> Kichwa Coders >>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, >>>>>> this time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) >>>>>> as >>>>>> can be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it >>>>>> from my side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to >>>>>> handle this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will >>>>>> be >>>>>> fixed. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in >>>>>> release, not sure if that can help. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1]: >>>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console >>>>>> >>>>>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Ondrej, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2 >>>>>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from >>>>>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Markus, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you >>>>>> mean that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many >>>>>> projects, then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, >>>>>> wtp, >>>>>> and reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 >>>>>> release entirely. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nitin, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is >>>>>> still publishing slf4j 2.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonah >>>>>> >>>>>> ~~~ >>>>>> Jonah Graham >>>>>> Kichwa Coders >>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP >>>>>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I >>>>>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1]: >>>>>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer < >>>>>> mkna...@eclipsesource.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially >>>>>> because the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 >>>>>> repository for building. I will try that now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is >>>>>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible >>>>>> to >>>>>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Markus >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* >>>>>> (Thanks Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done >>>>>> that I >>>>>> don't know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means >>>>>> that Eclipse Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel >>>>>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or >>>>>> jetty 10 from other sources. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to >>>>>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel >>>>>> please. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has >>>>>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 >>>>>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel >>>>>> output repo! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonah >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ~~~ >>>>>> Jonah Graham >>>>>> Kichwa Coders >>>>>> www.kichwacoders.com >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>>> >>>
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev