Eclipse Jetty 10.0.5 release (*not snapshot*) is now available on maven central.
- Joakim On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 5:48 AM Sravan K Lakkimsetti < sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote: > Platform testing is also complete. Verified the help feature and no issues > found. > > > > Thanks > > Sravan > > > > *From:* Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com> > *Sent:* 11 June 2021 15:50 > *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from > RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status > on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha > > > > I finished my testing of local RAP builds based on the Jetty 10.0.5 > snapshot consumed via WTP p2 repository, and with the latest platform build > from yesterday: > > > > Everything is looking good! > > > > For those interested in the details: My tests were based on the Gerrit > changes #181804 <https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/rap/org.eclipse.rap/+/181804> > and #181803 > <https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/rap/org.eclipse.rap.tools/+/181803> and > cover the installation of the RAP Tools into the new Eclipse SDK build, and > the creation of several RAP demo projects with the new RAP Runtime. All > this worked flawlessly and only the expected bundle versions from Jetty and > SLF4J were installed. Now I am looking forward to the final Jetty build. > > > > Thanks > > Markus > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 03:09, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 21:07, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > > The local build of simrel worked perfectly well - The expected 10.0.5 > snapshot version* was there. You can see a log of the build and tree of the > output directory attached. > > > > Because RAP only provided me a private build for the 10.0.5 snapshot test > which I used for my local tests, the local build doesn't match > https://download.eclipse.org/staging/2021-06/. The staging repo has no > slf4j (great!) but has two versions of Jetty (as expected). > > > > I have built and smoke tested (basic operation, help, checked which > versions are installed of jetty and slf4j) EPP packages locally against my > local simrel build and all looks good. I am not running the EPP build > against the public staging repo. Other than the final versions of Jetty we > can do preliminary testing on that ahead of the final build. > > > > I am *now* running the EPP build.... > > > > > So now we wait for the official 10.0.5 release of Jetty and we'll be good > to go. > > > > Jonah > > > > > > * The Platform and WTP repackaging of 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT took different > approaches, so while they are built from the same maven coordinates, the > ones in platform are version 10.0.5.SNAPSHOT and the ones from webtools is > 10.0.5.20210610181657 > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 18:50, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > > I have just seen that WTP has done the simrel contribution (thanks Nitin). > > > > RAP have provided me a private build. > > > > I am building everything locally now and will advise later today. > > > > Thanks, > > Jonah > > > > On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:47 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > > 👍 > > > > I was curious whether there is any changes to rerdeer needed going forward > now that it isn't republishing SLF4J alpha. > > > > Perhaps there is nothing more needed. > > > > I assume the WTP update is coming soon. Nitin, let me know if you need > anything in this regard. > > > > Thanks > > Jonah > > > > On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:37 Ondrej Dockal, <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Jonah, > > > > I have rebuilt my release update site, though, anything except reddeer > bundles timestamps have changed, as expected. But to initiate > an aggregator validation I have prepared a gerrit commit (without actual > change to aggrcon file) [1]. I can probably wait for [2] WTP change to > rebase and rerun to make sure we are good. > > > > [1]: https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181811 > > [2]: https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181810 > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:50 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Sravan has provided me with a link to what should represent Platform's > contribution based on the jetty snapshot. > > > > I don't think we need to wait for a respin of the snapshot for the source > bundle issue that Sravan identified. > > > > If other projects (RAP / Webtools/ Reddeer) can do the same, or provide me > with build instructions I can smoke test the integration of everything in > SimRel/EPP and make sure it all looks good and try to report back to Jetty > so they can make their release. > > > > Thanks > > Jonah > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Sravan K Lakkimsetti < > sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote: > > Triggered a platform build with latest 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT. But there is issue > in the source bundles as they contain temporary files > https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858764165 > > > > Thanks > > Sravan > > > > *From:* Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > *Sent:* 10 June 2021 21:36 > *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED from > RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the status > on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > The snapshot is ready > https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158 > > > > Thanks, > > Jonah > > > > On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part > thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits. > > > > I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has > slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected) > have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE). > > > > The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot ( > https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that > fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and JEE > package won't have alpha1 jar anymore. > > > > To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively test > that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a further > 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday. > > > > RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of > everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap). > > > > Any suggestions are very welcome. > > > > Thanks, > Jonah > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after RedDeer > is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty should be > built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating all deps > in all project, though, in quite late time. > > > > Thanks > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > > Hi Ondre/Nitin, > > > > https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738 > decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think > it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged. > > > > Thanks > > Jonah > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > > Hi Ondrej, > > > > AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from > reddeer. > > > > 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4 > (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j > [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found > > > > So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally > breaking WTP. > > > > Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there is > actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a > resolution of WTP first. > > > > I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment. > > > > Thanks, > > Jonah > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this > time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can > be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my > side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle > this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed. > > I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in release, > not sure if that can help. > > [1]: > https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console > > [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454 > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > > Ondrej, > > > > I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2 > site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from > Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer. > > > > Markus, > > > > Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean > that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects, > then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and > reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release > entirely. > > > > Nitin, > > > > I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is > still publishing slf4j 2.0. > > > > Jonah > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP > requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I > guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right? > > > > [1]: > https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/ > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com> > wrote: > > Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because > the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for > building. I will try that now. > > > > slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is now > referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to > remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2. > > > > Thanks > > Markus > > > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks > Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't > know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse > Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version. > > > > However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel because > they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or jetty 10 > from other sources. > > > > Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to > ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel > please. > > > > As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has Jetty > 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 contributed to > webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output repo! > > > > Thank you, > > Jonah > > > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
