Vladimir Kotal wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: > > <snip> > >> I feel quite strongly that not doing the checks in metaslot is >> actually wrong and isn't fixing the root cause of the problem. Having >> the check in metaslot is necessary to avoid the same problem across >> multiple providers plugged into userland (eg, softtoken vs smartcard >> vs tpm vs kernel). > > No one is disputing that (again, see CR 6266218) so I am not sure what > is the problem. Maybe I was not specific enough in the first mail which > was talking about addressing the "first part" ?
I missed that. I think the userland part in metaslot is more important to address though if we actually want to fix the root cause. -- Darren J Moffat
