Darren J Moffat wrote: > Vladimir Kotal wrote: >> Darren J Moffat wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> I feel quite strongly that not doing the checks in metaslot is >>> actually wrong and isn't fixing the root cause of the problem. >>> Having the check in metaslot is necessary to avoid the same problem >>> across multiple providers plugged into userland (eg, softtoken vs >>> smartcard vs tpm vs kernel). >> >> No one is disputing that (again, see CR 6266218) so I am not sure what >> is the problem. Maybe I was not specific enough in the first mail >> which was talking about addressing the "first part" ? > > I missed that. I think the userland part in metaslot is more important > to address though if we actually want to fix the root cause.
Yes, I agree it is. I just wanted to start from the bottom up (or from easy to not so easy). v.
