Vladimir Kotal wrote: > Krishna Yenduri wrote: >> mark powers wrote: >>> Could kcf_get_mech_provider() and kcf_get_hardware_provider() be >>> modified to check key length? >>> >> >> I agree. It is cleaner and fits in well with the goal of these routines. > > Just to clarify - are you okay with introducing new argument for > kcf_get_mech_provider() and kcf_get_hardware_provider() which would > pass key pointer and 2 new arguments for kcf_get_dual_provider() which > would pass encr_key and mac_key pointers ?
I'm okay with it. > > Keep in mind that not all callers of those 2 functions work with > keying material. and that would be the case of digest. > > > v.
