Hey Nikos, On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:26:50PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > I've applied patches 1-3, but I haven't applied this one. That is > because this will make the driver not compatible with the original > openbsd interface (we'll have structures with different content). I'd > suggest extensions like those to be added as a new ioctl that can be > checked for existence using an ifdef.
Just noticed: I've already done that in the past, when exporting the alignment constraints to userspace - see commit with hash 19033b1. And since now there is a dedicated ioctl for information retrieval, I could restore struct session_op's original content. What do you think? Greetings, Phil -- Viprinet GmbH Mainzer Str. 43 55411 Bingen am Rhein Germany Zentrale: +49-6721-49030-0 Durchwahl: +49-6721-49030-134 Fax: +49-6721-49030-209 phil.sut...@viprinet.com http://www.viprinet.com Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bingen am Rhein Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Mainz HRB40380 Geschäftsführer: Simon Kissel _______________________________________________ Cryptodev-linux-devel mailing list Cryptodev-linux-devel@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/cryptodev-linux-devel