Hey Nikos,

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:26:50PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>  I've applied patches 1-3, but I haven't applied this one. That is
> because this will make the driver not compatible with the original
> openbsd interface (we'll have structures with different content). I'd
> suggest extensions like those to be added as a new ioctl that can be
> checked for existence using an ifdef.

Just noticed: I've already done that in the past, when exporting the
alignment constraints to userspace - see commit with hash 19033b1. And
since now there is a dedicated ioctl for information retrieval, I could
restore struct session_op's original content. What do you think?

Greetings, Phil

-- 
Viprinet GmbH
Mainzer Str. 43
55411 Bingen am Rhein
Germany

Zentrale:     +49-6721-49030-0
Durchwahl:    +49-6721-49030-134
Fax:          +49-6721-49030-209

phil.sut...@viprinet.com
http://www.viprinet.com

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bingen am Rhein
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Mainz HRB40380
Geschäftsführer: Simon Kissel


_______________________________________________
Cryptodev-linux-devel mailing list
Cryptodev-linux-devel@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/cryptodev-linux-devel

Reply via email to