Hi, On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:48:47PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On 01/03/2011 04:01 PM, Phil Sutter wrote: > > Hey Nikos, > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:26:50PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > >> I've applied patches 1-3, but I haven't applied this one. That is > >> because this will make the driver not compatible with the original > >> openbsd interface (we'll have structures with different content). I'd > >> suggest extensions like those to be added as a new ioctl that can be > >> checked for existence using an ifdef. > > > > Just noticed: I've already done that in the past, when exporting the > > alignment constraints to userspace - see commit with hash 19033b1. And > > since now there is a dedicated ioctl for information retrieval, I could > > restore struct session_op's original content. What do you think? > > Do you mean reverting the 19033b1 commit?
Well, not completely. But I'd move the alignmask field into session_info_op, which should restore struct session_op's original form. Internally I would leave the alignmask field in struct csession, so alignment-checks will still be done. Greetings, Phil -- Viprinet GmbH Mainzer Str. 43 55411 Bingen am Rhein Germany Zentrale: +49-6721-49030-0 Durchwahl: +49-6721-49030-134 Fax: +49-6721-49030-209 phil.sut...@viprinet.com http://www.viprinet.com Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bingen am Rhein Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Mainz HRB40380 Geschäftsführer: Simon Kissel _______________________________________________ Cryptodev-linux-devel mailing list Cryptodev-linux-devel@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/cryptodev-linux-devel
