On 01/03/2011 04:01 PM, Phil Sutter wrote: > Hey Nikos, > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:26:50PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >> I've applied patches 1-3, but I haven't applied this one. That is >> because this will make the driver not compatible with the original >> openbsd interface (we'll have structures with different content). I'd >> suggest extensions like those to be added as a new ioctl that can be >> checked for existence using an ifdef. > > Just noticed: I've already done that in the past, when exporting the > alignment constraints to userspace - see commit with hash 19033b1. And > since now there is a dedicated ioctl for information retrieval, I could > restore struct session_op's original content. What do you think?
Do you mean reverting the 19033b1 commit? _______________________________________________ Cryptodev-linux-devel mailing list Cryptodev-linux-devel@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/cryptodev-linux-devel
