Rick Smith wrote: > It sounds like there are a number of interesting design questions. For > example, the sender and recipient must obviously share a secret key. Why is that obvious? What's wrong with encoding with the recipient's public key? Cheers, Ben. -- SECURE HOSTING AT THE BUNKER! http://www.thebunker.net/hosting.htm http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html Y19100 no-prize winner! http://www.ntk.net/index.cgi?back=2000/now0121.txt
- Re: The problem with Steganography Dan Geer
- Re: The problem with Steganography Marc Horowitz
- Re: The problem with Steganography Eric Tully
- Re: The problem with Steganography Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: The problem with Steganography Russell Nelson
- Re: The problem with Steganography William Allen Simpson
- Re: The problem with Steganography P.J. Ponder
- Re: The problem with Steganography Rick Smith
- Re: The problem with Steganography Ben Laurie
- Re: The problem with Steganography Rick Smith
- Re: The problem with Steganog... Ben Laurie
- Re: The problem with Steg... Russell Nelson
- Re: The problem with Steg... Rick Smith
- Re: The problem with Steganography lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: The problem with Steganography lcs Mixmaster Remailer
- Re: The problem with Steganography Alexandre Alvarez
- Re: The problem with Steganography Steven M. Bellovin