Paul A.S. Ward wrote:
> I'm not sure why no one has considered the PC banking problem to be a
> justification for secure computing.  Specifically, how does a user
> know their computer has not been tampered with when they wish to use
> it for banking access.
I think PC banking is an argument *against* Secure Computing as currently
proposed - there is no way to discover if there is a nasty "running" in
protected memory or removing it if there is.

The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to