Paul A.S. Ward wrote: > I'm not sure why no one has considered the PC banking problem to be a > justification for secure computing. Specifically, how does a user > know their computer has not been tampered with when they wish to use > it for banking access. I think PC banking is an argument *against* Secure Computing as currently proposed - there is no way to discover if there is a nasty "running" in protected memory or removing it if there is.
Agreed. It's a better argument for booting from a known CDROM distribution.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
