On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Ian Grigg wrote:
>Bill Frantz wrote: > >> [I always considered the biggest contribution from Mondex was the idea of >> deposit-only purses, which might reduce the incentive to rob late-night >> business.] > >... > >The first smart card money system in the Netherlands >was a service-station system for selling fuel to >truck drivers. As security costs kept on rising, >due to constant hold-ups, the smart card system >was put in to create stations that had no money >on hand, so no need for guards or even tellers. > >This absence of night time staff created a great >cost saving, and the programme was a big success. >Unfortunately, the early lessons were lost as time >went on, and attention switched from single-purpose >to multi-purpose applications. This underscores an important point. In security applications limitations are often a feature rather than a bug. We are accustomed to making things better by making them able to do more; but in some spaces it's actually better to use a solution that can do very little. Much of the current security/cryptography angst can be summed up as "small, limited, simple systems work, but big, complex, general systems are very hard to get right or have unintended drawbacks." Often the very generality of such systems is a barrier to their wide adoption. I would say that if you want to make any money in cryptography and security (and make it honestly) you should pick one business application, with one threat model and one business model, and nail it. Add no features, nor even include any room in your design, that don't directly address *that* problem. When you are able to present people with a solution to one problem, which has no requirement of further involvement than solving that one problem and introduces no risks or interactions other than those flatly necessary to solve that one problem, then they'll pay for it. But when we start talking about multi-function cards, it becomes a tradeoff where I can't get anything I want without getting things I don't want or risking network effects that will lead to markets dominated by business models I don't want to deal with. It makes the buy decision complicated and fraught with risk. Bear --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]