Peter Gutmann wrote:
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maybe it's worth doing some sort of generic RFC for this security model to
avoid scattering the same thing over a pile of IETF WGs,
Sounds good. Who wants to write it...?
Since there seems to be at least some interest in this, I'll make a start on
it. If anyone else wants to add their $0.03 to it [0], let me know.
It occurs to me that a number of these ideas could
be written up over time ... a wiki, anyone? I think
it is high past time to start documenting crypto
patterns.
FWIW, on opportunistic cryptography (a la "SSH model")
I wrote up a opportunistic draft paper here:
http://iang.org/papers/spock.html
(FTR, I've received substantial comments from TwanVDS
and DigbytT.)
iang
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]