Iang wrote:

>Why do we need the 1980s assumption of >being able to send freely to 
>everyone, anyway?

tech.supp...@i.bought.your.busted.thing.com is one that comes to mind. 
i...@sale.me.your.thing.com is another. I think the types of "prior whitelist 
only" secure systems being discussed on-list here lately will in the long run 
win out with the lions share of messages, but that bog standard 'dirty' email 
will persist for commercial interactions of the type I list above.

-David Mercer

David Mercer
Portland, OR

_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to