Iang wrote: >Why do we need the 1980s assumption of >being able to send freely to >everyone, anyway?
tech.supp...@i.bought.your.busted.thing.com is one that comes to mind. i...@sale.me.your.thing.com is another. I think the types of "prior whitelist only" secure systems being discussed on-list here lately will in the long run win out with the lions share of messages, but that bog standard 'dirty' email will persist for commercial interactions of the type I list above. -David Mercer David Mercer Portland, OR _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography