On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:33:01 +0000 radi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Iang wrote:
> >Why do we need the 1980s assumption of >being able to send freely
> >to everyone, anyway?
> tech.supp...@i.bought.your.busted.thing.com is one that comes to
> mind. i...@sale.me.your.thing.com is another. I think the types of
> "prior whitelist only" secure systems being discussed on-list here
> lately will in the long run win out with the lions share of
> messages, but that bog standard 'dirty' email will persist for
> commercial interactions of the type I list above.

On the other hand, tech.support@sillycompany could just accept all
contact requests, at least temporarily.

Perry E. Metzger                pe...@piermont.com
The cryptography mailing list

Reply via email to