On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:33:01 +0000 [email protected] wrote: > Iang wrote: > > >Why do we need the 1980s assumption of >being able to send freely > >to everyone, anyway? > > [email protected] is one that comes to > mind. [email protected] is another. I think the types of > "prior whitelist only" secure systems being discussed on-list here > lately will in the long run win out with the lions share of > messages, but that bog standard 'dirty' email will persist for > commercial interactions of the type I list above.
On the other hand, tech.support@sillycompany could just accept all contact requests, at least temporarily. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger [email protected] _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
