Natanael <[email protected]> wrote: > One: On the second paper, you assume a prime number as long as the message is > secure, and give an example of a message of 500 characters. Assuming ASCII > coding and compression, that will be just a few hundred bits. RSA (using > primes too) of 1024 bits is now being considered insecure by more and more > people. I'm afraid that simple bruteforce could break your scheme quite fast. > Also, why not use simple XOR in that case? >
Yep - bruteforce will work here. btw - when it comes to 'non-decryptable encryption' I still like OTP. :) Read or re-read Steven Bellovins wonderfull piece about Frank Miller, the Inventor of the One-Time Pad https://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=1460 I'm not a rude guy and try not to diminish your archievments but there's some truth in the following sentence: Even if clever beyond description the odds that someone without too much experience in the field can revolutionize cryptography are small. Can't remember who said this - or something similar to this - but it's true anyhow. Think about this every time when I try to 'invent' something within my fields. :) --Michael > > Den 18 jun 2012 12:56 skrev "Givonne Cirkin" <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > My name is Givon Zirkind. I am a computer scientist. I developed a method > of encryption that is not decryptable by method. > You can read my paper at: http://bit.ly/Kov1DE > > My colleagues agree with me. But, I have not been able to get pass peer > review and publish this paper. In my opinion, the refutations are ridiculous > and just attacks -- clear misunderstandings of the methods. They do not > explain my methods and say why they do not work. > > I have a 2nd paper: http://bit.ly/LjrM61 > This paper also couldn't get published. This too I was told doesn't follow > the norm and is not non-decryptable. Which I find odd, because it is merely > the tweaking of an already known method of using prime numbers. > > I am asking the hacking community for help. Help me test my methods. The > following message is encrypted using one of my new methods. Logically, it > should not be decryptable by "method". If you can decrypt it, please let me > know you did & how. > > CipherText: > > 113-5-95-5-65-46-108-108-92-96-54-23-51-163-30-7-34-117-117-30-110-36-12-102-99-30-77-102 > > Thanks. > > I have a website about this: www.givonzirkind.weebly.com > For information about the Transcendental Encryption Codec click on the "more" > tab. > Also, on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/TranscendentalEncryptionCodecTec > > Givon Zirkind > > > > You @ 37.com - The world's easiest free Email address ! > > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography > > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
