On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Adam Back <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually I think that was the point, as far as anyone knew and from the last > published semi-independent review (some years ago on the crypto list as I > recall) it indeed was end2end secure. Many IM systems are not end2end so > for skype to benefit from the impression that they still are end2end secure > while actually not being is the focus of this thread. The original Skype homepage (circa 2003/2004) claims the service is secure: "Skype calls have excellent sound quality and are highly secure with end-to-end encryption." (http://web.archive.org/web/20040701004241/http://skype.com/).
The new web page does not even use the word (web.archive.org/web/20130426221613/http://www.skype.com/). (Sorry to rewind so far back in the thread). Jeff _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
