On 15/06/14 19:16, ianG wrote: > For my part, I had seen his name only with respect to IETF WGs. However > I admit that I do not follow IETF security WGs closely, so am not > qualified to assert "highly active." You are right, I am wrong.
Thanks for that refreshing approach! I appreciate it, Cheers, S. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
