On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 01:25, Shawn Masters wrote: > I'm not sure what good being a language lawyer is going to do in > cases like this. In both cases the code is not compromised in the least, > and the validity of the complaint is in as much question as the code (if not > more).
I did not believe I was coming across as a language lawyer but as a programmer. > The first case has to be valid just from a logic perspective. > Exceptions don't allow multiple bi directional traversals of the stack, thus > once caught there is no way of doing any of the returns passed along the > way. Can you explain the last part of your sentence? I am not sure, at this hour being tired, what you mean by "there is no way of doing any of the returns passed along the way". At the very least with the Verify() function in pubkey.h at line 925 is the function is not declaring its going to be throwing a NotImplemented exception. If I declare it a call to Verify must be within a try-catch block right? Otherwise how will I know that the exception was thrown? > The second is a style issue at best. Style is always subjective. I agree with you on that. Stephen -- Stephen Torri GPG Key: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~storri/storri.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
