On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Wei Dai <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem with having more contributors is that in order to ensure > security, I'd have to review their code, and it would take just about as > long to review other people's code as to write it from scratch, and that > code would be less maintainable in the long run since it would be in a > different style from my own.
Agreed, I would love to see move semantics etc. if possible though. Seems to me there are some efficiencies to be made, but mixed c++11/c++98 is a PITA. I am not sure that if the efficiencies were to prove significant then it would be worth it. I would love to have time to try, its unlikely that I will though with my current commitments. One other thing that would be nice though is a better mechanism for issues and patches perhaps? In any case great library Wei, as is it is very good indeed, you need a donation button :-). -- David Irvine twitter: @metaquestions blog: http://metaquestions.me -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
