Dnia Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:31:43PM -0700, [email protected] napisa³(a):
>>[Wei Dai] The problem with having more contributors [...] security
I second that.
>>[Wei Dai] it would take just about as long to review other people's
>>code as to write it from scratch
With odds that a subtle trap (eg one exploiting compiler's optimization
quirks) will slip in anyway.
>[JH] I am sure at least some people would be willing to review code.
The code that Wei Dai wrote/writes can be reviewed now. But a very few
people on our Earth have the knowledge to review crypto code at all.
Plus, as we were enlightened recently, many of these few are working
meticuously on reviews in search for new venues. Why to gave them
opportunities to introduce more?
>
> --JH
TC, Ohir.
--
Wojciech S. Czarnecki
<< ^oo^ >> OHIR-RIPE
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users"
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected].
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
http://www.cryptopp.com.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
