On 05/24/2014 09:08 PM, David Irvine wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Wei Dai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The problem with having more contributors is that in order to ensure >> security, I'd have to review their code, and it would take just about as >> long to review other people's code as to write it from scratch, and that >> code would be less maintainable in the long run since it would be in a >> different style from my own. > > > Agreed, I would love to see move semantics etc. if possible though. Seems > to me there are some efficiencies to be made, but mixed c++11/c++98 is a > PITA. I am not sure that if the efficiencies were to prove significant > then it would be worth it. I would love to have time to try, its unlikely > that I will though with my current commitments. > > One other thing that would be nice though is a better mechanism for issues > and patches perhaps? > > In any case great library Wei, as is it is very good indeed, you need a > donation button :-). > >
Even if he does not add a donation button, chances are he's getting a grand one from me in one or two years... Great library indeed! R
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
