I'm using the csTicks received by iVirtualClock::GetElapsedTicks() to
control/advance simple thing animations (rotation, movement), which
should run for a specific time, in SetupFrame() (csevProcess event).
I don't know if this is the best/correct way to do this, but it worked
fine with cs-pseudo-stable-2005-09-03, as 1 csTick seems to be milli
second.
Now with cs-pseudo-stable-2006-01-27 all animations are running at
double speed. It looks like the resolution of the virtual clock has been
doubled: 1 csTick = 0.5 ms ?
The question is, is the assumption 1 csTick = 0.5 ms correct, or is this
only for my computer correct. Or is there a better way to get the real
time elasped between to frames?
Yours,
Ronald
--
-------------------- /"\
Ronald Kurz \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] X Against HTML Mail
/ \
:wq!
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Crystal-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
