On 2/7/06, Ronald Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using the csTicks received by iVirtualClock::GetElapsedTicks() to > control/advance simple thing animations (rotation, movement), which > should run for a specific time, in SetupFrame() (csevProcess event). > I don't know if this is the best/correct way to do this, but it worked > fine with cs-pseudo-stable-2005-09-03, as 1 csTick seems to be milli > second. > Now with cs-pseudo-stable-2006-01-27 all animations are running at > double speed. It looks like the resolution of the virtual clock has been > doubled: 1 csTick = 0.5 ms ? > The question is, is the assumption 1 csTick = 0.5 ms correct, or is this > only for my computer correct. Or is there a better way to get the real > time elasped between to frames?
We most certainly did not change this. A tick is still 1ms so most likely something else has gone wrong. What kind of animations have doubled in speed? Greetings, -- Project Manager of Crystal Space (http://www.crystalspace3d.org) and CEL (http://cel.crystalspace3d.org) Support Crystal Space. Donate at https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?group_id=649 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
