On 4/2/2010 6:28 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote: > The primary reasons I chose ultimately to have universal binary enabled > by default when implementing the support were: (1) it side-steps the > problem of developers having to be told explicitly how to build their > projects to support multiple architectures, and (2) it forces developers > at least to be aware of the issue, requiring them to take some action: > either disabling universal binary or setting up their development > environment properly to support it.
Another important consideration for having universal binary enabled by default is that most people (other than CS developers) will merely build and install CS once. This installation will be usable when 3rd-party CS clients are under development and thus probably being built using just the default architecture, as well as when building for deployment as a universal binary. -- ES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
