Hi, While going through the CrystalSpace code base recently, I got the feeling that while there is a lot in there in terms of plugins etc there, it seems that the different parts seem to be in pretty different states maintenance-wise. Now I am not a CS developer, and certainly not very knowledgeable regarding the CS code, but the logs show that some components get very frequently updated, while others see very little acitivity.
Now what I thought about was: given that the release of 2.0 is not that far away, wouldn't it be a nice idea to * Inspect what is all in the repository, which parts have someone maintaining and working on them, which are of sufficient quality to ship and maintain, etc. * Drop everything that doesn't meet these criteria * Use the newly gained development time to polish what is left to the extreme Such a "concentrate-on-the-core" move might help to invest development efforts on what is really important and, in the end, deliver a through-and-through high quality product with CS 2.0. What do you think? Regards, Denis Washington ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
