Thank you very much for advice. This is just a sketch of what it will
be... I'll change colors for visited links and font sizes (I think
I'll use ems) ... my problem is positioning in IE. I dont' know what
the problem is right now ... that's why I asked here.
On 6/26/05, Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Radu Adam wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the advice and tips. Can you take a new look at it? It
> > looks much better now... only that IE doesn't show it as it should.
> > Some more help needed, please.
>
> Looking only in FF 1.0.4, I don't see too many problems. Mostly it's
> nice.
>
> 1: a.com {
> font-size: 11px;
> font-weight: normal;
> text-decoration: none;
> color: #B30E0B;
> }
>
> a:hover.com {
> font-size: 11px;
> font-weight: normal;
> text-decoration: underline;
> color: #B30E0B;
> }
>
> can be condensed to:
> a.com {
> font-size: 11px;
> font-weight: normal;
> text-decoration: none;
> color: #B30E0B;
> }
>
> a:hover.com {
> text-decoration: underline;
> }
>
> A bigger problem is that your link colors above do not distinguish
> between visited and unvisited links. That's bad:
> http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040503.html
>
> 2: body {font-size: 70%;} makes no distinction based upon the visitor's
> browser setting. He could have set his to 12px because he has good eyes
> and a large display, or to 28px because he has weak eyes but a typical
> display, or left it alone because he found the shipped default perfectly
> suitable. Yet in spite of any of these desires or needs, you've decided
> he is wrong, and imposed text 49% the actual size of what he wants or
> needs: http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/area70.html A typical IE user
> may necessarily have already set his to larger or largest, in which case
> he cannot make it big enough to overcome your 70% rule. BTW, your 11px
> a.com link styles above to a user with 20px or more default will be
> functionally invisible in the absence of zoom capability.
>
> 3: A fixed width that requires 1024x768 resolution and a maximized
> browser to avoid horizontal scroll will make many unhappy. With
> 1024x768, IE maximized cannot be made wide enough to have no scroll.
>
> 4: Don't ask for an opinion about a page without supplying its complete
> location. Many email programs do not make clickable links in the absence
> of a stanadard URL prefix like https:// or ftp://. If you want help,
> don't make helping hard to do: http://www.dinamo-online.net/beta/
> --
> "Love does not demand its own way." 1 Corinthians 13:5
>
> Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
>
> Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
