> [2]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.xhtml
Having read this, I think it might be wise for me to declare my document as simply HTML. I ignorantly used XHTML only because that's what was output originally by Photoshop on my very first foray into an all-CSS layout. HOWEVER, the content area is going to be dynamic, and probably populated by a lot of crap entered by the users of the content management system. Therefore, it'll NEVER by XHTML by definition of the above resource. In the case where users are going to be using a WYSIWYG editor for the content part of the page, what should my page declaration be? I'm okay with using regular HTML declaration - I haven't studied enough of the standards to attempt XHTML yet and at some point have to give control to those who own the site and would do what they will with the content area - but I'm not sure what I should put in place of my XHTML declaration... ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
